logo
Volume 16, Issue 4 (5-2018)                   RBS 2018, 16(4): 476-488 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Bayrami M, Hashemi Nosratabad T, Atabati M. The Facilitative and Inhibitive Effect of Semantic Priming in Pronunciation of Working Memory. RBS 2018; 16 (4) :476-488
URL: http://rbs.mui.ac.ir/article-1-628-en.html
1- Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran. , Dr.bayrami@yahoo.com
2- Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.
3- PhD student of cognitive neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Tabriz University, Iran
Abstract:   (1914 Views)

Aim and Background: Working Memory (WM) has attracted the attention of experimental psychologists and neurologists. Those who pay attention to how people argue, solve problems, pursue their goals, make decisions and achieve cognitive control. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the subtle memory by means of words. In this regard, this research is an attempt to gather evidence of the speed of response in facilitating tasks and inhibition tasks.

Methods and Materials: The present study is a descriptive-correlational study. The statistical population of the study was all young and middle-aged people with a minimum age of 20 years without any history of mental and neurological disorders. In this research, 30 people were selected through targeted sampling. The facilitator's homework included the first pair of pseudo-word targets. The term inhibition was also indicated by two words in terms of meaning unrelated to the distance of 150 milliseconds. In fact, the response rate was evaluated in a semantic test based on the characteristics of these two assignments. The mean value in two assignments was compared using t- paired t-test.

Findings: The results indicated that the mean response rate to goals in the facilitated task was 4592.7± 480.9 millisecond more than the inhibition task (p<0.0001).

Conclusions: It seems that target memory representations by the first neutralization of the target memory representations are unrelated to the first one.

Full-Text [PDF 772 kb]   (412 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2020/02/8 | Accepted: 2020/02/9 | Published: 2020/02/9

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.