Volume 13, Issue 3 (12-2015)
RBS 2015, 13(3): 376-387 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
سامي ع, نظري ع م, محسنزاده ف, طاهري م. Explanation structural equation modeling of marital infidelity based, personality dimensions, marital satisfaction and attachment styles. RBS 2015; 13 (3) :376-387
URL: http://rbs.mui.ac.ir/article-1-412-en.html
URL: http://rbs.mui.ac.ir/article-1-412-en.html
1- دانشجوي دکتري مشاوره، گروه مشاوره، دانشگاه خوارزمي، تهران، ايران
2- استاديار، گروه مشاوره، دانشگاه خوارزمي، تهران، ايران
3- دانشجوي دکتري روان‌شناسي سلامت، گروه روان‌شناسي باليني، دانشگاه خوارزمي، تهران، ايران
2- استاديار، گروه مشاوره، دانشگاه خوارزمي، تهران، ايران
3- دانشجوي دکتري روان‌شناسي سلامت، گروه روان‌شناسي باليني، دانشگاه خوارزمي، تهران، ايران
Abstract: (2691 Views)
Abstract Aim and Background: Infidelity is a damaging Problem in couples Relationships That routed in different factors, But don’t exist no modeling for Its Explanation. This study investigated the infidelity structural equation model based on attachment styles, personality dimensions, and marital satisfaction was conducted. Methods and Materials: His study implements correlational design. For this purpose, 270 students were selected using a multistage cluster sampling method. Then, they completed the infidelity scale, attachment styles, personality dimensions and marital satisfaction questionnaires. The data was analyzed by using structural equation modeling with SPSS 18 and AMOS 18. Findings: The final model that also showed a good fit to the data indicated that secure attachment through the satisfaction had a significant negative effect on infidelity (effect indirect = 0.09, P < 0.01). Avoidant attachment style is also mediated by the satisfaction have effect on infidelity (indirect effect = 0.10, P < 0.01). Indirect effect of neuroticism (indirect effect = 0.14, P < 0.01) and extraversion (indirect effect = 0.08, P < 0.01) by mediatory role of satisfaction was positive. Agreeableness (indirect effect = 0.07, P < 0.05) and accountability (indirect effect = 0.08, P < 0.01) through satisfaction could also have a significant negative effect on the infidelity. Also Neuroticism (direct effect = 0.22, P < 0.01), extroversion (direct effect = 0.23, P < 0.01), the desire to experience (direct effect = 0.16, P < 0.01) is directly and positively, and responsibility as directly and negatively (direct effect = -0.16, P < 0.01) were effective against infidelity. Conclusions: The results of this study showed that attachment styles, personality dimensions and marital satisfaction are important in the marital infidelity. Therefore these Results can be used in prevention, Etiology and Therapy of Infidelity.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |